by Robert R. Raymond
November 28,2003
In a precendent-setting case,
the IRS wielded new power to
punish the political speech
of those who "espouse views"
the government considers "inconsistent"
with government-held beliefs.
In a hearing originally closed
to the public in a secret tribunal
on a military island, but moved
to a public location after protests
from the press and the public,
the IRS wants to wield this
power against a former IRS whistleblower,
who was forced to resign upon
his discovery of fraud in the
agency. After monitoring and
taping the whisteblower's appearances
on Sixty Minutes, talk radio
shows, and political publications
where he rebroadcast his findings
of IRS fraud, the IRS initiated
this inquisition against their
former whistelblower. This new
power may find new political
targets soon enough.
The IRS, through the small
office of "Director of
Practice," claims the authority
to wield carte blanche authority
over all the other powers of
government -- the authority
to monitor, surveil, and eavesdrop
on political dissenters, the
authority to pry into the private
financial records of banks,
businesses, and taxpayers, the
authority to conduct secret
investigations under a criminal
grand jury, and the authority
to censure political dissenters
by branding on them a badge
of infamy and stripping them
of governmentally-protected
licenses. In short, under the
guise of a "practice"
investigation, the IRS claims
the right to wield all intrusive
and invasive powers of government
available.
A "license" to practice
before the IRS -- even for people
who have never requested such
a license or actually practiced
before the IRS, but are given
one as a matter of law if they
are accountants -- "licenses"
the IRS to conduct private audits
without notice to the taxpayer,
confer with criminal prosecutors
without disclosure, and bring
special "disbarment"
proceedings against disfavored
dissenters, even if the alleged
"disreputable" conduct
has nothing to do with any "practice"
before the IRS.
The IRS now claims it can
use these so-called "practice"
investigations of anyone who
Congress licenses to practice
before the IRS -- regardless
of whether they actually practice
before the IRS -- to surveil
the public appearances of dissenters,
eavesdrop on the political conversations
of dissenters, benefit from
secret grand jury investigations,
hold secret conferences with
the criminal investigators,
surreptiously tap the private
database of taxpayer information,
including taxpayers who merely
have some financial "connection"
to the accused, audit the political
dissenter's personal financial
records, and use all this information
against the dissenter in the
"practice" proceeding.
Under the guise of a "practice"
investigation, the IRS can ignore
all the normal procedural protections
against an illicit audit while
it conducts such an audit. Simultaneously,
the IRS can ignore all the legal
protections afforded a person
accused of a crime while conferencing
with the people
conducting a criminal investigation.
Indeed, the IRS can even ignore
the
sunshine laws, as the records
of such "practice investigation"
are exempt from disclosure under
the Freedom of Information Act,
as are grand jury proceedings.
The IRS claims it can exercise
this authority in a secret proceeding
without allowing a person the
opportunity to cure any alleged
mistakes, the opportunity to
prepare a defense by knowing
the exact facts they are accused
of, without any opportunity
for discovery, without any opportunity
to call witnesses necessary
for their defense, without any
opportunity to cross examine
their accusers, without any
opportunity to testify at their
own hearing about the merits
of their position, without being
forced to testify against themselves
without such an assertion being
held against them, and without
even an opportunity for a hearing
on the evidence.
This power of this little
office with a Napoleonic vision
goes even beyond the Patriot
Act type authority and stories
of FBI monitoring of war protestors.
Too Hoover-ish to be true
in modern America? Just read
the case of the IRS against
Joe Banister scheduled for a
"hearing" -- a hearing
where the IRS prohibited Banister
from introducing any witnesses
or presenting any evidence as
to his defenses, and even discussing
the sincerity, the truth or
the "reasonableness"
of his positions -- on December
1 in the city by the bay, in
the Tax Court chambers of the
federal courthouse in San Francisco.
History is being made.
For more information contact:
Law Offices of Robert G. Bernhoft
S. C
207 East Buffalo Street
Suite 600
Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202
ph. 414-276-3333
fx. 414-276-2822
rgbernhoft@bernhoftlaw.com
rebarnes@bernhoftlaw.com
|